UFC 324 Controversy: Leaked Max Holloway vs Charles Oliveira BMF Fight & Fan Backlash Explained (2026)

UFC fans are up in arms, and it’s not just about the fights—it’s about the future of the sport. The UFC’s first major event under its new $7.7 billion Paramount deal has sparked a firestorm of controversy, leaving fans divided and questioning the direction of the organization. But here’s where it gets even more intriguing: a leaked announcement from the UFC Brazil account hinted at a blockbuster BMF title fight between Max Holloway and Charles Oliveira, only to be swiftly deleted, leaving fans wondering what could have been.

Let’s break it down. UFC 324 marks the beginning of a new era for the UFC, as it transitions from pay-per-view to live streaming on Paramount+. This shift promises to save fans nearly a thousand dollars a year, but the excitement has been overshadowed by a card that many feel falls short of expectations. The main event? An interim lightweight title fight between Paddy Pimblett and Justin Gaethje, which has left fans scratching their heads—especially since top contender Arman Tsarukyan was notably left out. And this is the part most people miss: the UFC’s decision to exclude Tsarukyan has fueled accusations of the organization prioritizing entertainment over merit, a move some fans liken to WWE-style storytelling.

But the drama doesn’t stop there. Earlier today, the UFC Brazil account accidentally leaked a third title fight for UFC 324: Max Holloway defending his BMF belt against Charles Oliveira. The announcement, which read, ‘Meeting of thick shells! Max Holloway and Charles Oliveira dispute the BMF belt at #UFC324!’, was quickly deleted, but not before it sent the MMA world into a frenzy. Bloody Elbow later confirmed that the fight was never officially added to the card, citing a miscommunication. However, the leak has left fans dreaming of what could have been—a rematch between two of the sport’s most electrifying fighters.

Here’s the controversial part: While the current card features high-profile matchups like Kayla Harrison vs. Amanda Nunes for the bantamweight title and Sean O’Malley vs. Song Yadong, fans argue it lacks the star power of a Holloway-Oliveira rematch. The UFC’s decision to pull the fight, coupled with the announcement of UFC 325’s main event—Alexander Volkanovski vs. Diego Lopes 2—has only added fuel to the fire. Some fans are even threatening to boycott the promotion, claiming the UFC is sacrificing competitive integrity for spectacle.

So, does the first UFC-Paramount card live up to the hype? Or is the UFC losing its way in pursuit of mainstream appeal? Is the organization prioritizing entertainment over sport, and if so, is that a betrayal of its roots? Let us know your thoughts in the comments. And while you’re at it, rate UFC 324 out of 10—would a Holloway vs. Oliveira rematch have changed the game?

Join our newsletter to stay updated on all the latest MMA news and analysis, delivered straight to your inbox every week!

UFC 324 Controversy: Leaked Max Holloway vs Charles Oliveira BMF Fight & Fan Backlash Explained (2026)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Rubie Ullrich

Last Updated:

Views: 6693

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (72 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rubie Ullrich

Birthday: 1998-02-02

Address: 743 Stoltenberg Center, Genovevaville, NJ 59925-3119

Phone: +2202978377583

Job: Administration Engineer

Hobby: Surfing, Sailing, Listening to music, Web surfing, Kitesurfing, Geocaching, Backpacking

Introduction: My name is Rubie Ullrich, I am a enthusiastic, perfect, tender, vivacious, talented, famous, delightful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.